2013-04-16 10:05:26 +02:00

157 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File

topics
about-us
style-book
simon-heffers-style-notes
4176464
-----
# Style notes 12: Jan 5 2009
3:38PM GMT 05 Jan 2009
Dear Colleagues
Please forgive the suspension of normal service over the Christmas holidays.
There has, however, been no suspension of errors.
It is becoming habitual - rather too habitual - for us to state apparent facts
or to make assertions without any attribution. If we are reporting a fact we
need to say where we have got that fact from: not least because, after further
investigation, it sometimes turns out not to be a fact at all. For example: we
very nearly carried an assertion that 90 per cent of people in this country
would be obese by 2050 without saying what our grounds were for making the
claim: it turned out to be a Department of Health report that we had noticed
several days earlier, but with which many of our readers may not be familiar.
But we also make many claims, particularly on our website, in news stories for
which no source is attributed. If we wish to be taken seriously we must always
provide attribution.
We also nearly ran a story in which we referred to "The Iraqi capital", which
we decided not to name as Baghdad. I am all for not patronising our readers
with phrases such as "the writer Charles Dickens", and I am sure they all know
what the Iraqi capital is. But common sense and good practice mean that we
must specify its name at the first mention: we can call it "the Iraqi capital"
at a subsequent mention. Similarly, we published an article that included
reference to "smoke and debris" in a building without ever mentioning that
there had been a fire.
Apparently one or two of you are under the impression that the noun "soldier"
can be used "generically" to describe any member of the Armed Forces. It most
certainly cannot. It is to be used only to describe a member of the Army. It
is not (and I should have hoped this was obvious) to be used to describe
members of the Royal Navy, Royal Air Force or Royal Marines.
Our readers remain vigilant and are often displeased when they spot a
solecism. We badly need our readers and it remains a good idea to encourage
them to continue to buy our newspaper. We ran the appalling phrase
"rottweilers are a powerful breed with well strong genetic guarding
instincts". It provoked the response from a customer that "I don't expect to
read teenage gangspeak in a Telegraph article innit". Others took it less
well.
Recycling is not, whatever you may think, a noun: it is a participle. Material
that is sent for recycling is just that: it is not to be labelled "recycling".
Flue is not a seasonal disease; it is part of a chimney. A commissioner and a
commissionaire do remarkably different jobs. The words "may" and "might" are
not interchangeable: the style book will explain the difference if you should
like to consult it. We do not use a capital letter after a colon; a colon does
not end a sentence. Partly and partially do not have the same meaning. Mammoth
is not spelt "mamouth". It is tabloid to label people as "mother" or
"grandfather" unless the relationship is directly relevant to the story: so
"mother saves her baby from drowning" is fine, but "grandfather beaten up and
robbed" is not. It is also tabloid to put people's occupations or positions
before their names rather than afterwards: so it is always "Gordon Brown, the
Prime Minister", never "Prime Minister Gordon Brown". These last two points
are clearly detailed in the style guide, and provide yet more exciting reasons
for reading it.
Finally, be careful to check any assumptions about "facts". We reported
recently that Sri Lankan security forces had attacked a "rebel city" that
housed the administrative headquarters of the Tamil Tigers. As a reader who
had recently visited the "city" pointed out, it is in fact smaller than most
English villages.
Yours sincerely
Simon Heffer
Associate Editor
The Daily Telegraph
[X][1] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][2]
* Share: [Share][1] [ ][3] [ ][4]
[Tweet][5]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/simon-heffers-style-
notes/4176464/Style-notes-12-Jan-5-2009.html
Telegraph
## [Simon Heffer's Style Notes][6]
[X][1] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][2]
Share:
* [ ][1]
* [ ][3]
* [ ][4]
* [Tweet][5]
* Advertisement
![][7]
Advertisement
[EDITOR'S CHOICE »][8]
### [Gil Scott-Heron: 'A voice for Shakespeare'][9]
[![Gil Scott-Heron][10]][9]
Composer, musician, poet and author whose writing provided a vivid commentary
on the black American experience.
### [Beekeeping diary: the new colonies arrive][11]
### [Spectacular light show dazzles Sydney][12]
### [WS Gilbert: a knight for our times][13]
### [The Telegraph's Matt is Hay Festival star][14]
Advertisement
Classified Advertising
* [Services][15]
* [Property][16]
* [Motoring][17]
Loading
[Find your ideal job with Telegraph Jobs][18]
var puffs_8120657 = new Array();