2013-04-16 10:05:26 +02:00

165 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File

topics
about-us
style-book
simon-heffers-style-notes
7927930
-----
# Style notes 24: September 21 2009
10:05AM BST 21 Sep 2009
Dear Colleagues
Forgive the interruption to normal service: holidays will happen. Also, there
have been technical difficulties with sending round robins through the new
Googlemail system. I hope that this has now been rectified. Because of the
amount of material to deal with, there will be another note in the next few
days.
To begin with, perhaps the most important thing of all to note is that it
appears to have been so long since some of you read your style books that you
have forgotten what is in them. I urge a refresher course for the start of the
new academic year, not least for those who have to read the copy of others and
yet fail to spot the errors in them.
For some of us, basic grammar has taken a tumble: and this is awful, because
it is the correct use of grammar that makes us intelligible. We wrote about
the Tory who had "left his wife for a woman while she was fighting cancer".
Was it the wife or the mistress who was ill? We often fail to understand where
hyphens should be used, or colons: colons do not precede a capital letter
unless it is the initial of a proper name, even in heads. We should never
split an infinitive. Criteria and strata are plurals, not singulars. Data is a
plural word. Something is different from something else, not different to it
and certainly not, as in one especially revolting usage, different than
anything. Troops are a large number of soldiers. Their singular is soldier. A
troop is a group of soldiers, never an individual one. When we show our
ignorance of terms connected with the Armed Forces the readers spot it at once
and are annoyed. We must take special care in these matters. Anticipate does
not mean expect. Only the Americans appeal a decision; we appeal against one.
The failure to read copy properly before it goes online has led to a crop of
distressing homonyms being published, mainly on the web. However, the most
horrific of all - in a standfirst - appeared in the paper, where we wrote
about Henry VIII's years on "the thrown". I need not tell you what this does
to diminish our credibility as a quality newspaper. Also appearing in the last
few weeks have been repost and riposte, avery and aviary, threw and through,
hordes and hoards (with the unfortunate "hordeing"), led and lead and,
inevitably, it's and its. There was also a near miss when someone was
described as "renounced" when we in fact meant they were "renowned".
Nothing should go online unless it has been properly checked and read through
first. This would have allowed spared us many of these mistakes. We would also
have caught some especially embarrassing literals, such as "fiend" for
"friend", "gardner" for "gardener", and a story about a poor man suffering
from "prostrate cancer". One is also "perturbed" not "peturbed". "Expat", if
we must use such a word, is not hyphenated, not least since the word of which
it is a truncation isn't.
The line of fire is not the firing line. Offstage and off stage mean two
completely different things. Do not use the phrase "back to back" when you
mean "consecutive". Also please note that while some chief executives are also
chairmen, it is usually not the case, and the two terms are not to be used
interchangeably.
Finally, two more general points. First, it cannot be stressed enough that
news reporting is not an appropriate place to express opinions. News reporting
should therefore be light on adjectives, which should be used only when
required for factual description. Using them to pass a comment on someone or
something, other than in humorous stories, is not acceptable. By the same
token, be careful to avoid saying that statistics "show" something when,
actually, they only suggest it; attribute all comments as precisely as
possible, rather than vaguely to "experts" - the only exception is in lobby
reporting.
Second, there has been a tendency in some of our sports coverage to become
unduly tabloid in some of our headlines. Please avoid this. The readers don't
like it, and it doesn't enhance our reputation. They don't want to read that a
team has "crashed out" of a competition, or had any other tabloid sensation
happening to it, and nor should we. That is why loaded and cliched words like
"soar" are also on the banned list.
_With best wishes _
_Simon Heffer _
_Associate Editor _
_The Daily Telegraph _
[X][1] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][2]
* Share: [Share][1] [ ][3] [ ][4]
[Tweet][5]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/simon-heffers-style-
notes/7927930/Style-notes-24-September-21-2009.html
Telegraph
## [Simon Heffer's Style Notes][6]
[X][1] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][2]
Share:
* [ ][1]
* [ ][3]
* [ ][4]
* [Tweet][5]
* Advertisement
![][7]
Advertisement
[EDITOR'S CHOICE »][8]
### [Gil Scott-Heron: 'A voice for Shakespeare'][9]
[![Gil Scott-Heron][10]][9]
Composer, musician, poet and author whose writing provided a vivid commentary
on the black American experience.
### [Beekeeping diary: the new colonies arrive][11]
### [Spectacular light show dazzles Sydney][12]
### [WS Gilbert: a knight for our times][13]
### [The Telegraph's Matt is Hay Festival star][14]
Advertisement
Classified Advertising
* [Services][15]
* [Property][16]
* [Motoring][17]
Loading
[Find your ideal job with Telegraph Jobs][18]
var puffs_8120657 = new Array();