2013-04-16 10:05:26 +02:00

364 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File

property
3355605
-----
# Cracking up
![The Middletons][1]
Taking the strain: Chris Middleton and family
Christopher Middleton 12:01AM GMT 13 Jan 2007
[Comments][2]
* ** [Your View: Tell us your experiences of subsidence][3] **
**Subsidence is on the increase, so could it be heading your way? Christopher
Middleton finds cracks in his south London home, and asks the experts for
help**
You know how it is when you come back home after a summer holiday. You dump
your suitcases down in the hall and cast an affectionate eye around the old
place, noting how reassuringly unchanged everything is.
Except that when my family and I came back home last summer, something had
changed. At the point where our kitchen extension had been joined on to the
house when we left for the airport, there was now a large crack stretching
from floor to ceiling, with a matching crack down the other wall. What's more,
these weren't just hairline fissures; they were fully fledged, jagged-toothed
gaps though which you could see alarming strips of daylight, big enough to
post a sheet of paper through.
Our first reaction was to blame my wife's sister, who had been house-sitting
for us during our fortnight away. On reflection, though, we concluded that the
presence of one sober, upright head teacher was hardly likely to have caused
this kind of architectural mayhem. Which left us with one other explanation
for our extension having decided (after six years) to part company with the
rest of the house. Yes, our family home was suffering from the structural
condition that dare not speak its name. Subsidence.
Time was, just uttering the dreaded S-word was enough to cast a medieval-style
curse upon your property. Confessing to a case of subsidence was tantamount to
painting a large red cross on the front door that for decades to come would
send potential purchasers scurrying away in fear.
## Related Articles
* [Subsidence: what you need to know][4]
17 Feb 2010
"Don't worry, dear," said my mother, when I rang her with the news. "They can
do wonders these days. You are insured, aren't you?" Good point. I rushed
straight to the great, bulging file marked "House", where I keep all documents
relating not just to our present home, but to the one we moved out of 10 years
ago. Like many householders, I respect and fear all official documentation,
while not actually bothering to read it.
With fingers flustered by the thought of having to fork out £50,000 for
industrial-scale underpinning, I managed to locate the section in the policy
booklet entitled "Subsidence". I discovered that, although we were going to
have pay the first £1,000, our insurers (the Halifax) were going to cough up
the other £49,000.
That was the theory. The first thing the man from the Halifax wanted us to
understand was that the remedial process was going to take months. That said,
it took him two minutes flat to identify the cause of the problem.
"Trees," he announced, peering out into the back garden. "In a long, hot
summer, like the one we've just had, your trees become thirsty, their roots
suck out all the moisture from the London clay - and you get subsidence."
It couldn't perhaps be a broken drain, we inquired. "No chance," came the
reply. "It's definitely trees. Could be that big one next door - what is it, a
ginkgo?" That's right, we gulped; it's a ginkgo. And the reason we knew was
because the tree was our neighbours' pride and joy. All of a sudden, we were
facing the ugly prospect of having to knock on their door and ask not if we
could borrow a cup of sugar, but if we could take a chainsaw to the soaring
splendour that was their ginkgo biloba.
"First, though," said our man with the clipboard, "we'll have to take soil and
root samples."
You could almost hear the sighs of relief. Five minutes earlier, we had been
grumbling about how long it was going to take. Now, we were glad of any excuse
to put off the suburban Armageddon that had been looming. In this part of
south-west London, asking your neighbours to cut down their favourite tree is
akin to turning up on their doorstep with an execution warrant for their
hamster.
Three cheers, then, for British insurance justice, which says that before any
tree can be convicted of subversive underground activities, evidence has to be
gathered. Hence the arrival, 12 days later, of two men carrying what looked
like an oversize Stilton cheese-corer, but which turned out to be a device for
extracting earth from the ground next to our extension. The only problem was
that the hand-held version couldn't dig down far enough, so the men had to
come back a fortnight later with a hydraulically-operated version that looked
like something out of an Alaskan oil-prospecting operation. This one reached
down to 3.8 metres, removing a neat, cylindrical cross-section of earth, clay
and tiny tree roots. Once the soil had been taken off for tests, two more
scene-of-crime officers turned up, one of them re-measuring the cracks ("not
much change"), the other assessing the dimensions of the trees and the likely
rapaciousness of their roots.
As to whodunnit - the curly willow, the silver birch, the hawthorn, the ginkgo
- none of these operatives was venturing an opinion. Just as radiographers
won't tell you the results of your X-rays, so this branch of the arboreal
police (not so much CID as TreeID) wasn't going to give away the identity of
the offending genus.
According to the Royal Horticultural Society, most root-related damage is done
by trees standing 10 metres or less from the house. "Rough rule of thumb,"
says Neil Curling, claims manager for Halifax Home Insurance, "is that if
you've got a 15ft-high tree, it should be at least 15 feet away from the
house. That said, it's not a precise science."
All of which means there's an element of guesswork in any tree-chopping
enterprise. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) recommends
that if you're not happy with your insurance company's post-investigation
conclusion (that is, raze every tree to the ground), you should get advice
from an independent party, in the form of a surveyor.
"A brief report will cost you between £250 and £500," says Tim Barton, of
Hungerford-based surveyors Dreweatt Neate. "In many cases, this can be money
well spent. What you have to remember is that insurance companies send in
their own advisers and loss adjusters, with a view to minimising the cost to
themselves."
It makes sense, of course. You don't have to be a financial wizard to work out
that an insurance company would rather monitor the situation over a period of
months, rather than send the bulldozers straight in and start underpinning.
Not that we'd have been overjoyed by the prospect anyway.
"Underpinning is a messy, disruptive solution," says RICS expert Roy Ilott.
"You're talking about excavating under the foundations of a house, and filling
that space with concrete. Even then, it's not 100 per cent effective. I've
been in underpinned houses that have then moved again.
"When subsidence first started to be a problem in the 1970s, everyone went for
underpinning, and insurance claims went through the roof. Nowadays, most
people try alternative treatments first."
One fundamental problem is that houses built before 1930 have foundations only
0.6 metres deep, as opposed to today's recommended depth of one metre (1.25
metres on clay). Even those homes built before 1950 only go down 0.7 metres.
So when hot weather and thirsty tree roots drain the ground of moisture, the
soil becomes less compact and the house on top starts to shift.
Take the tree roots out of the equation, then, and you should have a fighting
chance, shouldn't you? Not necessarily. "If you remove an established tree,
you can upset a status quo which the surrounding ground was happy with," says
Mr Ilott, "which can lead to further ground movement."
So to sum up the news for all us subsidence-sufferers: underpinning is an
expensive nightmare and may not work, while chopping down trees may make the
situation worse. Short-term, all we can do is sit and wait and fill the gaps
in the wall with bathroom tile grouting, so the winter winds won't get in.
Long-term, provided the extension stops moving, we can have a sort of house-
hernia operation, whereby a steel mesh is inserted into the corner walls, and
the grouting is replaced by a permanent, heavy-duty resin. In other words, we
superglue the house back together.
"If it's any consolation," says our insurance man, "there are a lot of people
round here [Southfields] in the same position. We've got half a dozen cases in
the next two or three streets." As to whether any of these count as genuinely
serious subsidence, The Sunday Telegraph's resident builder, Jeff "On The
Level" Howell, is sceptical.
Subsidence has been getting a lot of publicity due to the dry weather, but
serious subsidence damage is actually quite rare," he says. "Cracks that
appear following sustained periods of drought are often no cause for concern,
as they are quite likely to close up again in the winter when the clay
expands." Which is just the kind of thing we want to hear. What we're less
keen to be told is that 2006 was the hottest and driest since records began,
350 years ago.
'It'll be a few months before last summer's claims start to show up in
industry statistics," says Malcolm Tarling, of the Association of British
Insurers. "Though the conditions might well lead us to expect a fair amount of
subsidence in certain parts of the country."
Worst-affected areas, as always, are going to be those south of the imaginary
line that stretches from the Severn to the Humber. Here, the predominant soil
is clay, which has a natural propensity to shrink when moisture levels are
low. Since 1980, more than 150,000 houses in this area are estimated to have
suffered from subsidence.
"In a quiet year, we'll handle perhaps 3,000 subsidence claims," says Neil
Curling. "In a busy year, that figure can go up to 6,000. So far, it looks as
if 2006 is going to be somewhere in between those two figures. It was hot,
yes, but for some reason, there was very little subsidence in the south-west
of England. Instead it was all concentrated in the South-East."
So given that ground-heave afflicts so many homes within the M25, does that
mean there won't be such a stigma attached to our, ahem, condition? In years
to come, will potential purchasers be less inclined to run a mile, when they
find out we've had a wobbly extension?
"If you can show you have had work successfully carried out to remedy the
problem, that should be a bonus," says Mr Ilott encouragingly. "It's a bit
like having a certificate showing you've had the house treated for woodworm.
It demonstrates the problem no longer exists. "At least that's the logical
approach. Trouble is, when people are looking to buy a house, they don't tend
to act logically."
Thanks. Pass the grouting, please.
**Causes of subsidence**
Thirsty tree roots are responsible for 70 per cent of all subsidence cases
* Hot weather can cause the water table to drop and clay soil to contract
* Leaking pipe or drain - water washes soil away from foundations
* New paving or tarmac reduces the amount of water percolating into the
subsoil
* Shallow foundations. In houses built before 1930, they can be only half as
deep as in those constructed post-1980
**Who to lean on?**
* The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 0870 333 1600,
[www.rics.org][5] publishes a free leaflet, Subsidence - What Every Property
Owner Should Know. It canalso provide you with contact details for surveyors
in your area.
* Morgan Clark, 08000 975156, [www.morganclark.co.uk][6] act as independent
advocates for householders involved in substantial subsidence claims. They
charge 8.5 per cent of the total insurance claim settlement.
* Subsidence Claims Advisory Bureau, 01424 733727,
[www.subsidencebureau.com][7] offers insurance to homeowners who are finding
it hard to get PUPs (Previously Underpinned Properties) insured. advertisement
Free telephone advice, £125 fee for insurance assessment.
* 'Tree Root Damage to Building' by Dr Giles Biddle is available to
Telegraph readers for the special price of £69.95 (inc p&p), rather than the
normal price of £95.
**Legal implications**
**The buyer**
* **Can you sue a surveyor for failing to spot a house that has cracks, or,
subsequent to purchase, starts to subside?**
"The test is whether you can find another expert in the same field who will
say not only that the first surveyor was negligent, but that any competent
surveyor would have spotted the defects," says the Telegraph's property clinic
expert David Fleming, head of property litigation at William Heath & Co (see
[Property Clinic][8]).
* **Can you sue a vendor for disguising cracks?**
"Unlikely," says David. "As always, the rule 'buyer beware' applies."
**The seller**
* **If you're selling a house, are you legally obliged to declare obvious
cracks? Would it be foolhardy to declare the presence of subsidence in the
house's past?**
"It's common in commercial property transactions for solicitors to ask if the
property has suffered from things such as subsidence and accidental damage,
but less common in residential transactions," says David. "Even if the buyer's
solicitors ask questions, it's quite common for the vendor's solicitors not to
volunteer any information, but to refer the buyer to his or her own surveyor's
report on the property. As for admitting to subsidence, there is no obligation
on the vendor to come clean."
**Both parties**
* **Will the introduction of Homebuyer Information Packs make any difference
as to whether you can or can't disguise cracks or sue surveyors?**
"It's hard to see how, when a report has been carried out on behalf of a
vendor, the surveyor can then be pursued Fleming. Roy Ilott, of the RICS,
says: "There have been cases where judges have ruled that a surveyor working
for a vendor does have a duty of care towards a third, unknown party, that is
the buyer. There's always that outside possibility."
* **Does past subsidence affect the valuation of the property by the
mortgage company?**
"The surveyor inspecting the property for a mortgage company would probably
not have been informed about the place's history," says Roy. "Mostly, the only
briefing the surveyor gets is to be told where to pick up the keys and how to
gain access to the property. So, although her or she may report signs of past
cracks that have been filled, they won't see any current evidence of
subsidence provided the work has been carried out properly."
[X][9] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][10]
* Share: [Share][9] [ ][11] [ ][12]
[Tweet][13]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/3355605/Cracking-up.html
Telegraph
## [Property][14]
Related Partners
* [Innovative design from Alessi][15]
External Links
* ### [Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors][5]
[X][9] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][10]
Share:
* [ ][9]
* [ ][11]
* [ ][12]
* [Tweet][13]
* Advertisement
![][16]
telegraphuk
Please enable JavaScript to view the [comments powered by Disqus.][17] [blog
comments powered by Disqus][18]
Advertisement
sponsored features
Loading
Classified Advertising
* [UK Homes][19]
* [Overseas][20]
* [RHS Chelsea][21]
Loading
var puffs_8314099 = new Array();