2013-04-16 10:05:26 +02:00

136 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File

finance
personalfinance
comment
paulfarrow
8323713
-----
# Public sector pensions: workers face brutal reality check
## Another nail has been hammered into the coffin of public sector pension
schemes. As each month passes by, more and more damning evidence emerges that
proves that the current system is untenable.
[![Paul Farrow][1]][2]
By [Paul Farrow][3] 4:07PM GMT 14 Feb 2011
[Comments][4]
Teachers, nurses, firefighters and others are under no illusion that their
pensions face a major overhaul - and last week their fears would have been
confirmed.
Public sector retirement promises have become a "Madoff-style pyramid, now
collapsing under the weight of insufficient contributions, rising longevity
and an ageing workforce", said the Centre for Policy Studies in its report,
Self-sufficiency is the Key.
The Independent Public Service Pensions Commission, headed by Lord Hutton, has
already published its interim report, giving clear pointers as to the changes
that will be recommended next year. The reason is simple: we just can't afford
to keep them going.
Over the past 10 years the amount paid in benefits by the five largest public
service pension schemes has increased by 32 per cent. This rise has been
driven by an increase in the number of pensioners, the expansion of the public
sector workforce, longer life expectancy and the extension of pension rights
for early leavers and women.
Lord Hutton has questioned whether the contributions made by public sector
employees reflect the true cost of the benefits they receive. They don't.
(Anyone trying to secure an equivalent retirement income in the private sector
would have to invest significantly more into their pension plan.) He also
found that final salary schemes favoured high-flyers, rather than workers
whose career progression was more modest.
There are several options open, such as paying pensions based on a career-
average salary rather than a final salary. It won't be good news for many
workers: Mercer, the actuary, calculates that a teacher could be £10,000 a
year worse off by moving to a career average pension.
Another is to opt for hybrid schemes that combine elements of the existing
schemes and the newer defined contribution schemes. "DC" schemes are
fundamentally different from final salary schemes, as the pension paid depends
on how much you and your employer put into the fund, the performance of stock
markets and annuity rates.
But whichever route the Coalition goes down, it seems certain that workers are
going to have to put their hands in their pockets and pay more into their
pension pot.
The worm is turning. Workers who entered the public sector for job security
and a decent pension are now looking over their shoulders, unsure what the
future will bring. It is a burden that the private sector has had to cope with
for years. Welcome to our world.
**[![][5] ][6]Visit [Telegraph Retirement Services][6] for help and advice**
[X][7] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][8]
* Share: [Share][7] [ ][9] [ ][10]
[Tweet][11]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/comment/paulfarrow/8323713
/Public-sector-pensions-workers-face-brutal-reality-check.html
Telegraph
## [Paul Farrow][2]
* ### [Finance »][12]
* ### [Personal Finance »][13]
* ### [Comment »][14]
* ### [Pensions »][15]
[X][7] Share & bookmark
Delicious Facebook Google Messenger Reddit Twitter
Digg Fark LinkedIn Google Buzz StumbleUpon Y! Buzz
[What are these?][8]
Share:
* [ ][7]
* [ ][9]
* [ ][10]
* [Tweet][11]
* Advertisement
![][16]
telegraphuk
Please enable JavaScript to view the [comments powered by Disqus.][17] [blog
comments powered by Disqus][18]
Advertisement
[Telegraph Offers »][19]
* [Finance][20]
* [Investing][21]
* [Retirement][22]
Loading
var puffs_8121999 = new Array();